Sex Essay Example

Sex Essay Sex is a complicated issue when all religions in the world are considered. As all religions have varying opinions in regards to this, it is very hard to define. Sex is easier to classify as an open and a closed book, not really dependent on it being from the East or the West.In Hinduism, sex is very sacred. Girls and boys live in practically different worlds as friendship and interactions between sexes are frowned upon. In the old days, premarital sex was not an issue to them as girls were married off even before they reach puberty. Prostitution in India is very minimal compared to other countries as only very poor girls who are in dire need enter that kind of business. Though premarital sex is highly objected to, they are more sensitive to it than other religions. Highly conservative though are the teachings of Hinduism, they believe that sex is their sacred duty. Kama Sutra, which is the religious sexual ritual in Hinduism that people, all over the world, enjoy these days, regardle ss of the sacred purposes of it. The Hindus believe though that the tantra or the ultimate happiness and higher consciousness will be achieved through sexual intercourse. (Kohn.)Buddhism on the other hand repulses sex. They believe that one must be ridden of all worldly desires and sexual desire is one of them.   They believe that looking at something beautiful is wrong for it expresses a worldly self and wants that they believe they must not have. They believe that one must be totally selfless and unaffected by superficial things. Since they believe that feeling desire is evil, for men, the sexual act becomes a mere proof of their manhood which on its own expresses ego and for women, their duty. (Umekawa)Jainism on the other hand believes that sex is for mere reproduction only. Sex for them goes for as far as that purpose. Some believed at one point that they would achieve nirvana through sexual intercourses, but because the five human senses had been disregarded for that to be c onsidered, sex is considered to be somehow wrong. (Marett)Daoism on the other hand do not preach for it merely gives advices. It does not view God as someone who has worldliness like we do. It talks about alchemy and the exchange for every single thing in life, as the normal workings of the world. It does not object to worldly desires like food, sex and other material and superficial desires.   It only objects to it if it becomes an obsessive desire that over rules logic. But they also believe that sex is a way of getting eternal life.(Myers)Christianity objects to premarital sex though not if within the sacredness of marriage. They believe that it is the human duty to reproduce and multiply, because of this they are, by the teachings of the Bible required to have sex every single day except for days when a couple within the sacrament of marriage have agreed to abstain and worship God for the day. And this, they actually do because of God’s will. (Christianity and Sex)In Ju daism, they look at sex as a regular and natural body inclination like a person’s need to eat and drink to replenish the body. They believe that the abuse of the body by having improper sex is the same effect as by eating too much. (Lisa Katz)In Islam, unlike most religions, they believe that reproduction is not the sole reason for marriage and sex. They also believe that one of the many reasons for sex is the human comfort and the fun you derive from it, which is probably the most liberated religion of all.   They also believe that sex is not exclusive, resulting to a polygamous society. (Mills)Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Daoism are all from the East. Hinduism believes that sex is a sacred ritual of achieving higher consciousness and finally, ultimate happiness in the way of Kama Sutra. Christianity is a Western religion, but it also believes that sex is a duty, though not for ultimate happiness but reproduction according to God’s will.Sex is an act that must b e respected, regardless of religion. People do not really abide by the religious teachings but it gives them boundaries that restrain them. Though in most religions, men are the one supposed to enjoy it and the women to endure, it is not so. As both genders are given the physical urges.Religion in more ways than one, and not just by the differing teachings, is highly relative. The way the followers interpret the will of who they believe in is one of the many factors, and probably the major one, that affects it. Sex is, scientifically speaking, a mere bodily response. It is a part of human nature that has biological explanations and basis. It is something that the heavens above has given and created man with, regardless of what they meant it to be. Islam, in the sense of sex today is probably the most realistic belief. For today, sex is becoming common and a universal language and expression of love and mostly, fun.Sex is not evil, for it is a gift. But today, it is abused causing ra mpant sexually transmitted disease problems. If people abide by the teachings of their religion, save for the polygamous beliefs of Islam, it will not be so. Sex is an art as well, though conservative restraints will hardly consider it so. But the truth is, everything aside, sex is the best expression of love that binds you to the one you love. It is an act that combines you as one, and a world only you and your loved one could go. Sex without love is just an empty, meaningless job.Sex may be meant reproduction purposes, and religious acts, but still, it is for the people doing the act and the act in itself. Sex Essay Example Sex Essay Sex Name: Course: Instructor: We will write a custom essay sample on Sex specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Sex specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Sex specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Date: Sex The relationship between sex and love has been one of the most controversial topics in the modern world. The controversies have resulted in diverse views about this relationship. There are classical and modern treatments of the connection between sex and love necessitating the need to establish such differences. The philosophical treatment of sex and love assumes varied perspectives such as ethical, moral and human traits. The philosophical reductionist approach views sex as merely a means of achieving bodily pleasure that cannot be linked to any form of emotional connection between parties. On the other hand, the intentionalists view is that sex is a means of mental interaction between partners and is aimed at understanding their emotional connection of feelings of love towards each other. Love and sex are equally ethically significant phenomena in human society in both classical and modern societies. The controversies in these differences have resulted in the subject as to what amounts to love between partners. In addition, this results to the question of the differences between love and lust in relationships. Love and sex in relationships are usually viewed from a marital perspective. However, such is not limited to martial unions but also to relations between two people who share both emotional or sexual attractions and bonds. In the modern world, relationships brought about by sex and love are formed by individuals of similar or varied gender. Hence, sex is not confined to the limits of gender or sexuality of individuals but rather between two individuals who consent to their actions (Cahill, 2011). Humanistic views provide that there is a dire need to ensure respect of individuals and the human body. Hence, sex lacking in emotional connection or love should be condemned. Classical societies condemned lust in that it is termed as selfish in its quest for immediate physical or sexual pleasure at the expense of using one another to achieve such ends. Women usually prefer to have sex with individuals with whom they have an emotional connection with, or whom they share the feelings of love. Hence, a sexual experience with individuals with whom one shares mutual feelings of love is superior to sex with an individual with whom one does not. However, this is merely a humanist approach as it aims at ensuring respect for one another (Cahill, 2011). Sex has the capacity to accrue a sense of attaining a high level of feeling similar to ecstasy, provided it is actualized with feelings of love and delight in one’s partner. However, the lack of feelings and emotional connection with a partner usually results in the use of sex as a means of achieving short-term or immediate pleasure. Hence, this is an express illustration of the difficulty or challenge posed in the amalgamation of sex and love. Sex in the presence of love, according to provided literature, indicates that the body should be viewed in its entirety and that sex is intertwined with the emotional part of the human body. Hence, sexual arousal in terms of love is driven by the need to make an emotional connection through intercourse. However, sex without love usually views the body in terms of parts such as the bust, breasts, thighs and other sexually suggestive body parts. This is because of the act’s intent of merely establishing sexual contact in the short- term to derive momentary pleasure. Hence, the understanding of sex and love could be achieved by evaluating the two phenomena in their purest form. Sex is termed as a biological urge that is a result of the chemical activities in the human body, whereas love is termed as an emotional yearning resulting from the creation of the individual imagination. Sex is driven by the need to eliminate the organic tension inherent in sexual urges, whereas the feelings of love are escapist in nature as they are driven by the individual’s need to escape from feelings of inadequacy and gain completion or adequacy from another individual (Halwani, 2010). Sex is termed as an indiscriminate action between individuals whereas love is usually directed at a specific individual. Additionally, sex is common among animals, whereas love is known to few people who are termed as lucky to experience it. Sex without love is considered animalistic, whereas love without sex is not deemed as fulfilling. Expressions of love through sex are sensuous and tender in comparison to sex without love that is aimed at the release of sexual tension. Sex with love between individuals is aimed at forming an emotional connection. The two individuals involved in the act usually form a physical, emotional, spiritual and mental bond. This could be termed as the essence of sex with love. Sex with love receives equally as it gives equally. The partners usually view each other as valuable in terms of their worth in each other’s eyes, because either partner has selected the other over others. Hence love is termed as rich in terms of emotional, mental and physical attributes that are usually absent in sex without love. In addition, sex is a means to achievement of physical pleasure only, whereas love could be used as a means of achievement of either sexual and emotional pleasure or joy. Therefore, love usually dwells on treating a partner as high in value and not as a mere object for achieving pleasure. On the other hand, sex without love results in surrender to the conscious acts of bodily desires. In a similar fashion, sex with love attempts at attaining a similar state whereby one submits to the pleasures of another. Hence, at times sex with love and sex without love usually results in the objectification of either partner. For this reason, it is impossible to derive differences between sex with and without love due to blurred differences resulting from objectification. This is based on the question as to who thinks of love when they are overtaken by lust and sexual desires. Sex and love have a connection in that sex with love usually results in the consideration of one’s partner as one’s lover. This is because an individual is not separated from their consciousness because of sexual desire. Sex and love are complimentary in that, in love-filled relationships, sex enhances intimacy between individuals. This is illustrated by foreplay and after-play activities. Individuals in sex with love relations usually result in clasping of hands, intimate talks before, during and after intercourse. However, such acts are not carried out in sex without love relations. This is because individuals usually aim at achievement of sexual pleasure, in contrast to sex with love relationships that are aimed at enhancing the emotional or level of intimacy between two individuals (Halwani, 2010). Sex is termed as a means of communication; a language on its own used to convey information that is beyond words. Such communication is the focus of a sexual act in a sex with love relationship even without the achievement of sexual gratification. However, this is different from the sex without love relationships as mere sexual gratification is the aim of the relationship. However, there is also the aspect of individuals in sex with love relationships to surrender themselves to sexual pleasures instead of communicating their love through sexual acts such as caressing and thrusting. This leads to the loss of the sensuous aspect of a sex with love intercourse. Sex is complex in that some sexual acts may communicate other elements such as dominance, submission and aggression. Hence, sex could devalue the sensuous aspect of the art of making love, resulting in the loss of its essence. However, love is also interpreted in different perspectives. Some are of the view that sex is impossible with individuals they cannot love. Love in such a context may refer to an attraction to the individual attributes such as physique and character. Hence, essentially this is attraction that exists between two individuals. Such attraction to qualities may be termed as animalistic and an example of mating techniques. This attraction is associated with qualities that are of erotic significance to an individual (Blackburn, 2004). Insecurity is also another feature in both sex with love and sex without love relationships. In sex with love relationships, insecurities manifest themselves in the form of a partner’s reluctance to engage in sexual intimacy with another individual. In sex without love, individuals exhibit insecurity in their failure to exercise fidelity to one another as they risk commitment to one another and are driven by the need to accrue immediate sexual gratification and thus evade any form of emotional connection and surrender. Hence, an individual usually withholds an aspect of individuality with the aim of preventing an emotional connection and surrender. Hence, sex without love is not fully spontaneous as an individual withholds an aspect of himself. However, withholding feelings and emotions does not guarantee the eventual development of an emotional connection or attachment with a lover. This is because this is the possible attraction to certain attributes existent in a lover. It means surrender to aspects, which are attractive from a sexual perspective, which is surrender to lustful feelings. Hence, in sex without love relationships individuals harbor feelings that could be termed as a form of emotional connection. Thus, lack of an attraction and presence of lustful feelings would result in the absence of sex between non-lovers (Blackburn, 2004). Furthermore, individuals in sex without love relationships are driven by other needs such as intimacy, acceptance, relationships and confirmation of their ability to attract other people. Hence, such needs are also paramount for satisfaction in addition to the need for equal sexual gratification between partners. Hence, this results in the need for a connection for individuals to have their identified needs satisfied. This has potency to result to love and an emotional connection. Sex with love enables individuals to overcome individual inadequacies and isolation. Love has a high degree of individual awareness and a high degree of absorption in the other person. However, this could be termed as a paradox in that it is nearly impossible to find one while losing oneself in another. This could be translated as the need to find oneself through losing oneself in another. Giving self and finding self is the essence of sex with love. However, this is absent in sex without love relations. This is based on traditional Puritanism views that love is existent without sex and sex is possible without love. This views that human beings are sex machines that can be turned on an off at the pleasure of a partner. Hence, sex is a means to an end that is the achievement of sexual gratification. Hence, this also results in the eventual loss of the sexual aggression and desire for a partner. This is because the lack of feelings results in lack of desire essential for sexual drive (Halwani, 2010). Hence, it is evident that love is paramount for ensuring sexual gratification in relationships, lack of which leads to objectification and unsatisfactory sexual intercourse. Additionally literature provided indicates that the presence of an emotional connection between individuals in sexual relations usually results in loss of individuality. This leads to unsatisfactory sexual intercourse in such relationships. This is because the aspect of togetherness leads to a notion that both individuals have identical needs, expectations and wants form one another, which is false. Hence, there is a need for individuality irrespective of the presence of emotional connections between individuals (Cahill, 2011). In conclusion, love is seemingly a significant phenomenon in successful human romantic and sexual relationships. However, there is also paramount need for individuality to maintain an aspect of independence and difference in terms of expectations and needs from one another. Love provides sexual gratification due to the presence of an attraction between partners in the sexual relationship. Bibliography Blackburn, S., 2004. Lust. New York: New York Public Library. Cahill, A. J., 2011.Overcoming Objectification: A Carnal Ethics. London: Routledge, Halwani, R., 2010. Philosophy of love, sex, and marriage: an introduction. New York: Routledge.